Knowledge Decay Dashboard

🗄️ View Archived Chunks
Document Summary Confidence Actions
airpuriv2.txt
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
Last analyzed: 2025-12-05 11:17:37.454071
85.15%
Explain Decay
api_test_doc.txt Legacy
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
Last analyzed: 2025-12-05 10:31:47.354852
83.0%
Explain Decay
file1.pdf
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
Last analyzed: 2025-12-05 14:25:24.965758
32.0%
Explain Decay
file2.pdf
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
Last analyzed: 2025-12-04 09:18:08.914585
73.12%
Explain Decay
Finance_contradictory.txt
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
Last analyzed: 2025-12-05 09:03:57.743343
73.44%
Explain Decay
Finance.txt
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
Last analyzed: 2025-12-05 14:25:25.049945
27.44%
Explain Decay
test1.txt
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
Last analyzed: 2025-12-05 14:19:15.281956
59.58%
Explain Decay
test2.txt
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
Last analyzed: 2025-12-05 14:35:23.156635
66.54%
Explain Decay
test_api_doc.txt
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
Last analyzed: 2025-12-05 10:09:00.752144
97.0%
Explain Decay