Knowledge Decay Dashboard
| Document | Summary | Confidence | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| airpuriv2.txt |
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
|
85.15%
|
|
| api_test_doc.txt Legacy |
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
|
83.0%
|
|
| file1.pdf |
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
|
32.0%
|
|
| file2.pdf |
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
|
73.12%
|
|
| Finance_contradictory.txt |
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
|
73.44%
|
|
| Finance.txt |
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
|
27.44%
|
|
| test1.txt |
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
|
59.58%
|
|
| test2.txt |
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
|
66.54%
|
|
| test_api_doc.txt |
This document contains multiple knowledge units evaluated for technical, operational, and regulatory relevance. Decay patterns show mixed stability: some chunks retain strong validity while others show temporal drift, outdated assumptions, or limited evidentiary grounding. Domain scores reveal gaps in modern compliance or operational applicability, particularly where regulatory references or updated best practices are missing. Overall, the content remains useful, but several sections warrant revalidation against contemporary standards and newer sources.
|
97.0%
|