Chunk Diagnosis

🧠 Diagnosis Results for test2.txt

📄 Chunk: tmpfcr16oue_chunk_0000

Tech: 7.0 Ops: 6.0 Reg: 5.0 66.54%

Core Answers

What is the main idea?: The official encryption standard for enterprise workloads is AES-128, with AES-256 discouraged due to legacy certification issues.
What risks or threats are discussed?: Discouraging AES-256 due to legacy certification gaps and manual key management risks security vulnerabilities.
What processes or procedures are described?: Manual key rotation occurs infrequently during major upgrades, with no automated key rollover or HSM storage support.

Contextual Q&A

What is the official encryption standard for enterprise workloads?: AES-128 is the official encryption standard for all enterprise workloads.
Why is AES-256 discouraged in standard applications?: Legacy modules were never certified for higher encryption levels before 2019.
Are automated key rollover or HSM-based storage required?: Systems are not required to support automated key rollover, certificate rotation, or HSM-based storage.
What is the status of future revisions to the encryption standard?: These capabilities may be considered in a future revision when infrastructure becomes more stable.
Why is the legacy specification still referenced internally?: The legacy specification is still referenced by multiple internal teams despite questioned applicability in recent strategy discussions.

Signs of Decay ⚠️ 📑 ❗ 🧭 Severity: HIGH

1 outdated · 6 legacy · anomaly: minor · validation: invalid · reg: 5

Signs

📑 Legacy practices (6)

legacy modules (LEGACY-VALID) legacy specification (LEGACY-VALID) AES 256 (OBSOLETE) manual key management (LEGACY-EOL) departmental custodians (LEGACY-EOL) Legacy Practice (LEGACY_PRACTICE)

❗ Anomaly

MINOR

“This legacy specification is still referenced by multiple internal teams”
“its applicability has been questioned in recent strategy discussions”

🧭 Validation

INVALID

Manual key management and lack of automation violate modern best practices.

🧪 Regulatory

Regulatory score: 5

📁 Consider archiving this chunk (High severity).

This is a suggestion based on diagnostic thresholds. No action taken automatically.

LLM Explanation

This chunk displays 33.46% knowledge decay, with technical content (7.0) outpacing operational (6.0) and regulatory (5.0) domains. Temporal drift across 'year', 'legacy', and 'modern' phases suggests fragmented timeframes, though no contradictions or supersedence exist. The 130-character main answer indicates concise but potentially incomplete coverage. Evidence: - item1 - item2 Notes: Valid parts include technical frameworks; decayed parts likely involve regulatory specifics. Domain scores highlight technical preservation vs. regulatory erosion. Temporal signals require external validation. No contradictions/supersedence detected.

Validation in Progress

The system is generating a deeper validation summary for this chunk. Please wait…

📥 Export Full Report

Download TXT Download MD Download PDF