{
"badge_class": "score-green",
"chunk_id": "tmpcco06t_q_chunk_0000",
"confidence": 97.0,
"contextual_qna": [
{
"answer": "Active (ionizing) and passive (filtration) types.",
"question": "What are the two types of air purifiers mentioned?"
},
{
"answer": "HEPA is more effective at removing particles, but MERV can handle more air volume.",
"question": "How do HEPA filters compare to MERV filters in efficiency?"
},
{
"answer": "No, HEPA filters do not generate ozone or harmful byproducts.",
"question": "Do HEPA filters produce ozone?"
},
{
"answer": "Permanent removal of dust and particulate matter from the air.",
"question": "What is the main advantage of passive purifiers?"
},
{
"answer": "Higher air resistance and pressure drop from denser filters.",
"question": "What factors affect the energy costs of MERV filters?"
},
{
"answer": "At least 75% for particles between 0.3 and 1.0 micrometers.",
"question": "What is the capture rate of MERV 14 filters?"
},
{
"answer": "To remove coarser impurities, reducing HEPA cleaning frequency.",
"question": "What is the role of pre-filters in HEPA systems?"
},
{
"answer": "To purify air via ultraviolet germicidal irradiation.",
"question": "What is UVGI used for?"
}
],
"contradictions": [],
"core_answers": {
"What is the main idea?": "Air purifiers are categorized into active (ionizing) and passive (filtration) types, with passive methods being more efficient due to permanent particle removal.",
"What processes or procedures are described?": "Filtration via HEPA and MERV filters, UVGI, and ionization to remove airborne particles.",
"What risks or threats are discussed?": "HEPA filters avoid ozone emissions, but higher efficiency MERV filters increase energy costs due to air resistance."
},
"decay_score": 0.03,
"decay_summary": {
"anomaly": {
"evidence": [],
"status": "NO"
},
"archive_suggestion": false,
"counts": {
"legacy_indicators": 0,
"outdated_terms": 0
},
"legacy": [],
"outdated_terms": [],
"regulatory_gap": false,
"regulatory_score": null,
"rollup": {
"text": "0 outdated \u00b7 0 legacy \u00b7 anomaly: no \u00b7 validation: valid \u00b7 reg: \u2014"
},
"severity": "LOW",
"validation": {
"reason": "",
"status": "VALID"
}
},
"domain_scores": {
"operational": 6,
"regulatory": 0,
"technical": 8
},
"explanation": "This chunk shows minimal decay (3.0%) and no domain-specific scoring (tech/ops/reg: 0.0), suggesting it contains stable, non-technical foundational information. The \u0027year\u0027 temporal marker indicates time-sensitive context, though no contradictions or supersedence are present. The low decay rate implies long-term relevance, but the absence of domain scores may limit its applicability to specialized contexts. Evidence: - item1 - item2 Notes: Valid parts include the temporal \u0027year\u0027 signal. Decayed parts: None. Domain scores suggest non-technical focus. Temporal drift: Year-specific data. No contradictions/supersedence.",
"is_archived": false,
"ops": 0.0,
"prompt_diagnostics": {
"error": "failed to parse batched JSON v2"
},
"reg": 0.0,
"score_evidence": [
{
"dimension": "technical",
"phrase_from_text": "HEPA filters do not generate ozone or harmful byproducts."
},
{
"dimension": "operational",
"phrase_from_text": "Higher efficiency MERV filters... increase energy costs."
}
],
"summary": "This chunk shows minimal decay (3.0%) and no domain-specific scoring (tech/ops/reg: 0.0), suggesting it contains stable, non-technical foundational information. The \u0027year\u0027 temporal marker indicates time-sensitive context, though no contradictions or supersedence are present. The low decay rate implies long-term relevance, but the absence of domain scores may limit its applicability to specialized contexts. Evidence: - item1 - item2 Notes: Valid parts include the temporal \u0027year\u0027 signal. Decayed parts: None. Domain scores suggest non-technical focus. Temporal drift: Year-specific data. No contradictions/supersedence.",
"supersedence": [],
"tech": 0.0,
"temporal_signals": [
"year"
]
}
Terms classified based on their relevance and usage in the document.
Biocide-treated filters are under research, indicating they are not yet supported.
MERV filters are standard but increase energy costs.
Technical aspects are well-covered, but operational and regulatory impacts are limited.
Research status may indicate a minor inconsistency in current practice.
Practices align with known standards, though energy costs are a known trade-off.
{
"badge_class": "score-yellow",
"chunk_id": "tmpcco06t_q_chunk_0001",
"confidence": 73.29,
"contextual_qna": [
{
"answer": "They create greater air resistance, requiring higher pressure drops and more energy.",
"question": "Why do higher-efficiency MERV filters increase energy costs?"
},
{
"answer": "To prevent the spread of airborne pathogens by incorporating antimicrobial agents.",
"question": "What is the purpose of biocide-treated air filters?"
},
{
"answer": "Increased air resistance leads to higher energy consumption in central systems.",
"question": "What is the main challenge with high-efficiency MERV filters?"
},
{
"answer": "Yes, research focuses on developing viable biocide-treated filters for pathogen prevention.",
"question": "Are there ongoing studies related to air filters?"
},
{
"answer": "They increase air resistance, necessitating greater air pressure drops.",
"question": "What effect do denser MERV filters have on airflow?"
},
{
"answer": "Energy costs for the central system are significantly increased.",
"question": "What consequence results from higher air pressure drops?"
},
{
"answer": "To enable effective antimicrobial-coated air filters that prevent airborne pathogen transmission.",
"question": "What is the goal of the mentioned research efforts?"
}
],
"contradictions": [],
"core_answers": {
"What is the main idea?": "High-efficiency MERV filters increase air resistance, raising energy costs, while research explores biocide-treated filters to combat airborne pathogens.",
"What processes or procedures are described?": "Research into antimicrobial-coated air filters for pathogen prevention.",
"What risks or threats are discussed?": "Airborne pathogen spread is a risk addressed by biocide-treated filters."
},
"decay_score": 0.2671,
"decay_summary": {
"anomaly": {
"evidence": [
"there is ongoing research to enable viable and effective biocide treated air filters"
],
"status": "MINOR"
},
"archive_suggestion": false,
"counts": {
"legacy_indicators": 2,
"outdated_terms": 0
},
"legacy": [
{
"label": "air resistance",
"tag": "LEGACY-VALID"
},
{
"label": "biocide treated air filters",
"tag": "OBSOLETE"
}
],
"outdated_terms": [],
"regulatory_gap": false,
"regulatory_score": 3,
"rollup": {
"text": "0 outdated \u00b7 2 legacy \u00b7 anomaly: minor \u00b7 validation: valid \u00b7 reg: 3"
},
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"validation": {
"reason": "Practices align with known standards, though energy costs are a known trade-off.",
"status": "VALID"
}
},
"domain_scores": {
"operational": 4,
"regulatory": 0,
"technical": 8
},
"explanation": "This chunk exhibits significant decay (26.71%) alongside elevated domain scores (tech:8.0, ops:6.0, reg:3.0), indicating specialized technical/operational content that has aged poorly. The absence of temporal markers suggests lack of time-sensitive context, raising questions about relevance. While domain scores imply robust technical detail, the high decay rate compromises reliability. No contradictions or supersedence are present, but the decayed parts may include outdated operational procedures. Evidence: - item1 - item2 Notes: Valid parts: Domain-specific technical details. Decayed parts: Potentially outdated operational data. Domain scores reflect technical depth. Temporal drift: No explicit signals. No contradictions/supersedence.",
"is_archived": false,
"ops": 6.0,
"prompt_diagnostics": {
"prompt_1": {
"evidence": [
"Higher efficiency MERV filters",
"air resistance",
"biocide treated air filters"
],
"explanation": "Terms classified based on their relevance and usage in the document.",
"terms": [
{
"category": "CURRENT",
"term": "MERV filters"
},
{
"category": "LEGACY-VALID",
"term": "air resistance"
},
{
"category": "CURRENT",
"term": "biocide treated air filters"
}
]
},
"prompt_10": {
"evidence": [
"Higher efficiency MERV filters are usually denser and increase air resistance in the central system requiring a greater air pressure drop and consequently increasing energy costs"
],
"status": "VALID",
"summary": "Practices align with known standards, though energy costs are a known trade-off."
},
"prompt_2": {
"evidence": [
"biocide treated air filters"
],
"explanation": "Biocide-treated filters are under research, indicating they are not yet supported.",
"references": [
{
"category": "OBSOLETE",
"item": "biocide treated air filters"
}
]
},
"prompt_4": {
"evidence": [
"Higher efficiency MERV filters are usually denser and increase air resistance in the central system requiring a greater air pressure drop and consequently increasing energy costs"
],
"status": "STANDARD_PRACTICE",
"summary": "MERV filters are standard but increase energy costs."
},
"prompt_6": {
"evidence": [
"Higher efficiency MERV filters",
"air resistance",
"increasing energy costs"
],
"scores": {
"operational": 6,
"regulatory": 3,
"technical": 8
},
"summary": "Technical aspects are well-covered, but operational and regulatory impacts are limited."
},
"prompt_9": {
"evidence": [
"there is ongoing research to enable viable and effective biocide treated air filters"
],
"status": "MINOR_ANOMALY",
"summary": "Research status may indicate a minor inconsistency in current practice."
}
},
"reg": 3.0,
"score_evidence": [
{
"dimension": "technical",
"phrase_from_text": "Higher efficiency MERV filters are usually denser and increase air resistance in the central system requiring a greater air pressure drop and consequently increasing energy costs"
},
{
"dimension": "technical",
"phrase_from_text": "ongoing research to enable viable and effective biocide treated air filters i e air filters coated with antimicrobial agents for preventing the spread of airborne pathogens"
}
],
"summary": "This chunk exhibits significant decay (26.71%) alongside elevated domain scores (tech:8.0, ops:6.0, reg:3.0), indicating specialized technical/operational content that has aged poorly. The absence of temporal markers suggests lack of time-sensitive context, raising questions about relevance. While domain scores imply robust technical detail, the high decay rate compromises reliability. No contradictions or supersedence are present, but the decayed parts may include outdated operational procedures. Evidence: - item1 - item2 Notes: Valid parts: Domain-specific technical details. Decayed parts: Potentially outdated operational data. Domain scores reflect technical depth. Temporal drift: No explicit signals. No contradictions/supersedence.",
"supersedence": [],
"tech": 8.0,
"temporal_signals": []
}