🧠 Diagnosis Results for test1.txt

πŸ“„ Chunk: tmpk8nkx9te_chunk_0000

Tech: 10.0 Ops: 9.0 Reg: 7.0 59.58%
Core Answers
  • What is the main idea?: Enterprise systems must adopt AES 256 encryption, phase out AES 128, and implement automated key management with HSM support for regulated data.
  • What risks or threats are discussed?: AES 128 is deemed insecure and poses operational risks if not phased out immediately.
  • What processes or procedures are described?: Mandatory key rotation every 90 days, centralized KMS tooling, and certificate/service key/token rotation.
Contextual Q&A
  • What is the minimum encryption strength required?: AES 256 is the minimum acceptable encryption strength.
  • When will AES 128 be phased out?: AES 128 must be phased out immediately as it is considered insecure.
  • What tools are required for key management?: Automated workflows using centralized KMS tooling are mandatory.
  • What is required for systems with regulated data?: HSM support is required for systems containing regulated data.
  • When did this document become effective?: This document replaces all previous encryption guidelines and is the current authoritative standard as of 2024.
  • What is the replacement for AES 128?: AES 256 is the minimum acceptable encryption strength replacing AES 128.
Signs of Decay ⚠️ πŸ“‘ Severity: MEDIUM
1 outdated Β· 1 legacy Β· anomaly: no Β· validation: valid Β· reg: 7

Signs

πŸ“‘ Legacy practices (1)
AES 128 (OBSOLETE)
🧭 Validation
VALID
  • Aligns with best practices for encryption, key management, and rotation policies.
πŸ§ͺ Regulatory
  • Regulatory score: 7
LLM Explanation
This chunk displays 40.42% decay, highlighting critical information degradation. While tech domain strength (10/10) remains intact, ops (9/10) and reg (7/10) domains show erosion. Temporal drift signals 'year' and 'version' indicate versioning but lack explicit supersedence markers. No contradictions exist, but the high decay rate suggests outdated content. Evidence: - item1 - item2 Notes: valid parts include tech domain strengths; decayed parts involve ops/reg weaknesses. Domain scores reflect tech dominance but ops/reg gaps. Temporal signals suggest iterative updates, though no explicit supersedence relationships are documented.
Validation in Progress

The system is generating a deeper validation summary for this chunk. Please wait…

πŸ“₯ Export Full Report

Download TXT Download MD Download PDF